We Read Science Fiction

We Read Science Fiction random header image

Earth By David Brin

June 11th, 2008 · 2 Comments · 3/5 - Enjoyable and Fun

Earth by David BrinEarth by David Brin was nominated for a Hugo in 1991 and chronicles a large cast of characters through a number of ecological issues and crises. It’s a 50-year forward prediction (now only 30 years away) of the consequences of technology and commerce on the environment as he saw them in 1988. I enjoyed the book and am glad I read it. My eco-sense has been sharpened somewhat, as has my love for mother Earth. However, the story itself is (understandably) preachy, heavy and complicated, and for the first two hundred pages I was worried the novel was really a collection of dozens of different short stories set in the same future. In the end though the threads do eventually come together and are woven into a single cohesive story…. barely.

Summary: An interesting read, especially in light of the recent events at the Large Hadron Collider and the rising green awareness that pervades modern daily life. The interesting characters and settings saved this heavy and preachy novel from being simply another eco-manifesto. A 3/5 in 2008, but should have been a must read in 1988.

The Wikipedia page for Earth outlines a number of predictions that Brin made that have come true. Some of the links/proofs are tenuous at best, but the overall accuracy is still impressive. If 30 years from now the world really is in the sorry state that this book predicts, maybe I don’t really want to save for retirement.. or maybe I should retire now and enjoy it while I can.

The main plot of the book is only a lose skeleton upon which to hang Brin’s predictions of ecological disaster. Basically, a group of scientists have created a micro black hole that they allowed to escape and while looking for it, they discover a larger one that has been eating away at the inside of the Earth and growing for years and is on the verge of reaching the tipping point. They put all their brains together and search for ways to “push” the second black hole out of the Earth’s core before it’s too late. However, the number of pages relating directly to this plot are few, maybe a third of the book total. The rest is stories are about ocean cities, glass ark pyramid zoos, privacy invading technology, food wars, water shortages and scientific research.

SPOILER ———
Lastly, my biggest beef with this book is that Brin envokes the “Aliens did it” argument for no good reason. He spends endless pages setting up the fact that humans can make black holes — deliberately — then tells the reader that we’re not to blame for our biggest ecological challenge yet?! If all the other woes of the Earth are hung on humanity’s ill-advised, short-term raping of the world, why are we magically exempt from this one?
END SPOILER ——

In the end, you will probably enjoy the book if you have enjoyed Brin’s other works, but please don’t start with this one, it’s not his best work. Alternatively, if you’re still questioning the parasitical, destructive impact we’re having on our home world and need to read about it one more time, this is as good a place as any for your daily dose of doom and gloom… Since it’s still pretty accurate 20 years after it was written. For everyone else, pick up Brin’s Uplift double trillogy instead. You’ll have more fun and it’ll let you escape for a few minutes from the fact that we’re all going to die when the seas rise, the sun bakes and the smog chokes us all.

Tags: ·····

2 responses so far ↓

  • 1 James Tankersley Jr // Jun 11, 2008 at 2:58 pm

    I see that the GLAST telescope has been launched today.

    How much time might be required before analysis of GLAST data might indicate proof or rejection of Hawking Radiation theory?

    This could be critical in determining the safety of the Large Hadron Collider, due to begin collisions later this year.

    Unlike what CERN tells the public, the Large Hadron Collider Safety Assessment Group (LSAG) writes that current safety arguments are not valid proof of safety. Micro black holes might be created by the Large Hadron Collider, they might not evaporate, they might grow quickly and we have not been damaged by cosmic rays because cosmic rays pass harmlessly through Earth. CERN also tells the public that a new safety report has been completed, but so far the final report has not been released for review by world’s scientists.

    The legal complaint before US Federal Court in Hawaii demands 4 months to review this safety report and a permanent injunction if safety can not be assured to within reasonable industry standards. First hearing is scheduled for June 16, 2008.

    Learn more at (DELETED)

  • 2 Cam // Jun 11, 2008 at 3:05 pm

    Everyone: I only approved the last comment to end this before it begins. I have no fear of the LHC and discussions of it are unrelated to the discussions of this book, so they should go elsewhere.

    James: How did you find this blog post so fast? Are you simply trolling for any and every loosely related place to post this canned doom and gloom comment? I’ve seen what you’ve done to other reputable discussion places, and that won’t happen here. I’ve neutered the post as well to remove the link to your site. I’m not endorsing it.

Leave a Comment